BI remains atop business managersโย wish listsย and, not coincidentally, on ITโsย to-do list. The demand for BI and analytic tools is unlikely to abate any time soon.ย
For many CIOs, however, delivering new and innovativeย
BI appsย has been a bit of a Sisyphean challenge: ballooningย
data volumesย combined withย
complex IT environmentsย have stressed legacy BI tools. Consequently, IT has been scrambling to keep up with usersโ desire for intuitive,ย
easy-to-consume BI appsย that incorporate all of the latest bells and whistles and corporate information sources.ย
That conundrum is the theme of a new Forrester Research Inc. report,ย
Agile BI Out of the Box, by principal analyst Boris Evelson.ย
Adding to the difficulty of BI projects is the complexity of their underlying IT architecture and infrastructure, Evelson writes: โMultiple components must be considered includingย
data integration, cleansing, modeling, warehousing, metrics creation and management, reports, dashboards, queries, alerts and many more, with infinite approaches to cobble them together into a useful and meaningful BI application.โย
Meanwhile,ย
BI stakeholdersย are largely dissatisfied with BI appsโ agility and flexibility, according to the results of a Forrester survey. Although packaged BI applications have had some success in delivering relief to specific business functions, Evelson contends, โthey are not a panacea for addressing all of the shortcomings of traditional BI applications.โย
The thrust of Evelsonโs report is that a new way of designing and building BI applications is needed. He maintains that the โtried-and-trueโ BI design approach โโcollecting information about all data sources, documenting every entity and attribute, creating a data warehouse or data mart based on the information collected, and then gathering specifications for BI applicationsโโ is not always up to the challenge posed by todayโs complex IT environments and user demands.
Traditional waterfall software development, Evelson writes, โis almost guaranteed not to work for the majority of BI requirements.โย Forrester calls its new approach โAgile BI.โ It may sound like just another buzzword for you to ignore-another analyst (ironically)ย calling for the deployment of new softwareย or IT methodologies to fix the software purchased and rolled out beforeโฆwhich was going to fix everything that was wrong before that.ย
But Evelson makes a good case for Agile BI. The two-fold purpose, he says, is to get the development done faster and to react more quickly to changing business requirements. In the report, he takes a deep dive into the technical requirements, organizational changes and vendor strategies required by companies that want to make the switch.
โMostly, Agile BI is no different than any Agile development methodology that calls for incrementally delivering products versus a big-bang approach; for rapid prototypes versus specifications; for reacting versus planning; and for personal interactions with business users versus documentation,โ Evelson writes. โThe Agile BI methodology differs from other Agile approaches in that it requires new and different technologies and architectures for support. Metadata-generated BI applications are one such example of a new technology supporting Agile BI.โ
Companies that want to transition to an Agile BI strategy will need to start small and apply it to targeted business cases, he writes. Vendor management is also going to be critical in this relatively new IT discipline.
Evelson is resolute on the methodologyโs future: โAgile BI is clearly here to stay and succeed, since most traditional, non-Agile BI platforms and applications will be increasingly challenged to keep pace with a world moving at lightning speed.โ